Nolan Perroni, PC - Wins Landmark Civil Service Promotion Case for Methuen Firefighter - Commission slams every level of city government

Nolan Perroni, PC was very proud to represent Methuen firefighter Tracy Blanchette in her courageous fight against systemic discrimination in Methuen's fire service, which fight resulted in this landmark victory. Every level of government actively worked against the appellant in order to preserve a culture of favoritism and gender bias. The Civil Service Commission here has, in a 58-page stinging decision, called the City on the carpet, not just for their discriminatory employment practices, but for concealing conflicts of interest, for outright ignoring complaints of gender bias and for the repeatedly dishonest sworn-testimony by top ranking city officials.

In light of the intolerable conduct proven in this significant case, the Commission is prepared to issue the very rare remedy or ordering that the City promote Ms. Blanchette from private to Captain, with all back pay and benefits.

In concluding that gender bias fatally undermined the justification for bypass offered by the City, the Commission found that Blanchette has had a remarkable 26+ year career, despite the obvious challenges associated with being the City's first female firefighter and only ever Methuen firefighter to give birth and manage a family working 24-hour shifts.

Among other things, the Commission found:

  • Given how dubious I am of much of Chief Sheehy’s testimony concerning the process, the City’s evidence is not credible and cannot be relied upon to sustain its burden of proof in this bypass appeal.
  • The predisposition in Tulley's favor was compounded by Chief Sheehy's predisposition against Blanchette due to a proven personal and institutional bias against her in which her gender was a contributing factor.
  • Sheehy thinks the number of women firefighters - three - is sufficient...he sees no need to increase the number, to recruit women into the fire service, or to take any proactive steps to encourage more female applicants in Methuen. He has never done so, nor has he ever thought about doing so. As is often the case with unconscious biases, some people simply refuse to acknowledge them, no matter how obvious they may appear to others.
  • multiple witnesses testified about the mutual back-scratching employment culture available to the male but not the female firefighters of the MFD.
  • Blanchette was treated unfairly, in violation of the basic merit principles set forth in GL c. 31, Sec. 1, and that instead gender bias fatally undermined the justification for bypass offered by the City.
  • Chief Sheehy exercised great influence over the other three interview panelists (two of whom had never worked in the fire service), going so far as to advise them at the start of the interview process of the answers he expected to hear based on the questions posed to the candidates.
  • It is plainly evident to me that all the contractual and other internal processes normally in place to ensure fair treatment were, in fact, unavailable to her, and instead were actively or passively working against her.
  • Despite being a city of over 50,000 people, Methuen has only had four female firefighters in its history...Chief Sheehy seemingly does not believe that women are underrepresented in the Methuen Fire Department. When asked if he would consider requesting an all women's civil service list to address this issue, Sheehy replied, "I don't think we're lacking in numbers, though," and "I didn't even know there was an all female list where I could grab a few."
  • Chief Sheehy testified, "I'm not looking to recruit women."
  • Despite his long tenure as Union President and the existence of discriminatory conditions (women barred from certain shifts, locations and assignments reserved for men only), Sheehy never filed a greivance to remedy this disparate treatment of female firefighters.
  • The record persuasively demponstrated that Blanchette was consistently scored unfairly during the internal interview presided over by Chief Sheehy.
  • I can remember no other example of the use of a post-Assessment Center promotional process that was as flawed as this one...
  • Anne Randazzo, the City's Human Resources Director and Chief Equal Employment Officer, did not testify forthrightly.
  • The City Council ignored Blanchette's gender discrimination complaint. It approved the promotion of Tulley on February 4, 2019, after receiving Appellant’s detailed complaint of gender discrimination. The Council never asked a single question of Chief Sheehy during its meeting and Councilor McCarty voted in favor of Tulley without even mentioning his family relationship with the Intervenor.
  • Randazzo is the City official responsible for investigating complaints of discrimination. She was directly involved in this case. She never even considered looking into the complaint, even though she received a copy from either Chief Sheehy or the Council shortly after it was filed...For that matter, neither did the Mayor, the Chief, the Council, or the Union.

Read the Decision Here

Nolan Perroni wins Interesting Case at Civil Service Commission

In a case handled by NP Attorney Gary Nolan, the Civil Service Commission this week overturned a decision by the Massachusetts Environmental Police not to hire a candidate who, at the time of his application, was a Westfield Police Officer.  A decorated veteran of the U.S. armed services who speaks five languages, the officer had an exemplary record as a police officer in Westfield.  He was bypassed based largely on an incomplete and error laden background investigation performed by a long-time MEP Officer.  The case is a great teaching point for witnesses preparing to go before the Commission.  Click here to read the full story.

Read more

Major legal publication makes front page story of NPH’s Meghan Cooper

NPH Attorney Meghan C. Cooper appeared on the front page of this week’s edition ofMassachusetts Lawyer’s Weekly, in connection with the newspaper’s coverage of her significant Appeals Court victory earlier this month. The digital version of the article is below in PDF format – just click to read it in full.

In related news, Lawyer’s Weekly has named Meghan one of twenty-five recipients of its 2015 Excellence in the Law Award for Up and Coming Lawyers. We are so proud of her for receiving this prestigious honor, although not a bit surprised. We are very lucky that Meghan has chosen to dedicate her remarkable skill set to the representation of the thousands of hard working men and women who make up the NPH labor family. We will post more on the award when it is published in April.

Cop can’t be fired for refusing to testify at civil service hearing | Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

NPH WINS MAJOR CIVIL SERVICE CASE AT APPEALS COURT – NEW RULE OF LAW CREATED

NPH Attorney Meghan Cooper has won a major victory for civil service employees across Massachusetts.  In a case of first impression, the Appeals Court ruled that a municipality may not discipline employees for failing to testify at local appointing authority hearings that are held – as the Court found – for the benefit of the employee and not for the benefit of the City.  To that end, the Court held that employees may not be ordered to testify at such hearings.  This decision will greatly aid civil service employees in determining how to defend themselves through the multi-layered appeals process available to public employees.

In this particular case, Meghan represented NEPBA Local 911, the Worcester Police Patrolman’s Union.  After the officer was fired by the City Manager for failing to testify at his own hearing, after an order to do so, NPH appealed, and the Civil Service Commission overturned the termination.  The City then appealed to the Superior Court, and the Court ruled in favor of the Union and officer.  The City then appealed, again, to the Appeals Court who likewise ruled for the officer.

Meghan’s Appeals Court victory is the latest in this string of victories for the Union, and her  appellate argument involved an in-depth analysis of more than 100 years of the civil service law and its amendments, beginning with the creation of the law back in the late 1800’s right up through the present day.  The Court took this opportunity to clarify for all that the appointing authority hearing is a fundamental right of due process that belongs to the employee alone, and is not for the benefit of the employer.

To read this important case, click below:

Dykas Appeals Court Decision

 

Civil Service Commission’s Residency Decision Upheld by Superior Court

The 10-mile residency requirement of the Civil Service statute, GL c. 31, Sec. 58, caused much concern over the past year.  In Town of Rockland, the Commission required that the Appointing Authority examine its Fire Department roster to determine whether it was in compliance with the law; the Commission several months later heard evidence and determined that — at the time of the hearing — the Town was in compliance.  The complaining officer appealed; arguing that the Commission should have examined whether the Town was in compliance as of the date of the complaint, and not as of the date of the hearing. The Court found that the Commission was correct.

Basically, the Commission, concerned with the wide-ranging impact of its decision, allowed several months for any compliance issues to be corrected.  The Court ruled that the Commission has broad discretion as to what it investigates, and its thoughtful examination of the residency issue was the appropriate action.

To read the decision, click below:

erickson-craig-superior-110314

NPH Defends Police Officer’s Right to Remain Silent

NPH Attorney Meghan Cooper argued a case of first impression at the Appeals Court recently on behalf of NEPBA Local 911, the Worcester Police Patrolmen.  The Court will decide whether to uphold NPH wins at both the Civil Service Commission and the Superior Court, and determine whether an officer can be forced, under threat of termination, to testify at his own disciplinary hearing.  Atty Cooper worked closely with the Attorney General’s Office and the Civil Service Commission in defending these decisions.  We will keep you posted.

To read the Appeals Court brief NPH filed on behalf of the NEPBA member, click below.

Appeals Court Brief.Worcester and Civil Service Comm.

Civil Service Commission Updates its Appeal Forms

The Massachusetts Civil Service Commission announced today that it plans, over the next several weeks, to update its appeal forms for both Promotional Bypass cases, as well as Examination Appeals. Forms are available on the Commission’s Website, and links to each are below: